Sunday, September 27, 2015

Singapore's immigration problem

Singapore has always relied on immigration to drive her economy, all the more so, in the face of low fertility rate and aging population. However, aside from acting as a stimulus to the economy, the large influx of immigrants also gives rise to social tensions and discord. Xenophobic comments can be easily found on the online platform, and news report highlighting frictions between Singaporeans and immigrants are published regularly. The social consequence brought about by migration, therefore, is severe and will further escalate to affect the society as a whole unless a common understanding is reached between the locals and immigrants. This essay will highlight the main problem of migration, the various impacts on the society and discuss some of the existing measures as well as to propose possible solutions to address the issue.

The main problem of migration is the inability to fully integrate the immigrants into the society. The large intake of immigrants has made integration of foreigners extremely difficult, and as a result the locals and immigrants were unable to understand each other. This in turn leads to cracks and tensions in the society. According to Lim (2015), the local population accused the foreigners for congestion and rising property prices. Lim added that this unhappiness materialized in General Election 2011. In fact, the discontent persists and oppositions made rallies centered on migration issues in the recent General Election 2015. It is apparent that citizens still consider immigrants as outsiders instead of a fellow citizen, which explains why the locals express hostility towards the immigrants. Citizens feel that the foreigners should not be entitled to the same rights as them such as housing and jobs. In addition to the dissent from the local population, the foreigners also have problem understanding the society and culture. A notable example would be the Anton Casey incident, where according to Fenn (2014), British banker Anton Casey inappropriately dubbed the commuters on the public transport as “poor people” on Facebook. He was then forced to flee the country after receiving death threats and losing his job. This shows that the issue with migration has been dragged on for so long that it is now at its tipping point. A simple misstep from a lack of understanding of the culture can result in angry backlash from the society. Clearly, failure in social integration of immigrants is causing social tensions and issues.

To ease the tensions, the government has implemented several schemes such as the Fair Consideration Framework (FCF). According to Ministry of Manpower (MOM), the FCF comprise of new measures to ensure that companies consider Singaporeans fairly for employment opportunities. This framework was implemented to prevent ‘hiring-own-kind’ or hiring practices that discriminate against Singaporeans. This framework, however, does not guarantee that all Singaporeans get employed. In the case that a more qualified immigrant competes for the same job, the immigrant will get employed. However, as the Singaporean does not know that the immigrant has better qualifications, he will still feel discriminated. Hence, ill feelings towards the immigrants still exist, which does not help to reduce or ease the social tensions.

Another scheme that has been implemented is the Singapore Citizenship Journey (SCJ). According to the National Integration Council, the SCJ is a mandatory two months program for prospective citizens to have greater understanding of the Singapore’s history, culture and norms, as well as to interact with the local communities. This program aims to orientate and integrate the new citizens into the society; however, it overlooked the low participation rate from Singaporeans. As there is no channel for communication between new citizens and the locals, it is highly unlikely that both parties can understand each other. This means that it is only a matter of time before social frictions occur.

To successfully integrate the immigrants, education is the key. Singaporeans have to understand that the city-state’s economy needs immigrants, and being intolerant of foreigners could spell disaster for Singapore. Tolerance and an accepting attitude can be instilled, just like how racial harmony was inculcated. The government can implement school programs to raise awareness or to ingrain certain mindset. Currently, the education system mandates Community Involvement Programme (CIP), which is to impart the mindset of giving back to the community. Activities such as litter picking are done to raise awareness about the littering situation in Singapore, newspapers collection are done to inform the importance of recycling, and trips to old folks’ homes are organized to encourage volunteerism. The CIP could be extended to tackle the migration issue, by encouraging interaction and understanding. However, one-sided effort from the locals will not be enough. The government can also make community involvement compulsory for immigrants. In addition, prospective citizens should be discouraged to send their children to international school, as there is no better way to integrate into the society than to experience local lifestyle.


In conclusion, the problem that comes with migration is a long-standing issue and will need time to eradicate the root of the problem, starting with education at its core. This essay has discussed the underlying reason for social frictions and discord, which is the inability to integrate immigrants. Despite the fact that several measures has been implemented, the social frictions still exist as these measures largely overlooked the importance of social integration. It is, hence, imperative that the government takes actions to educate both locals and immigrants to have a tolerant and accepting attitude. And for that to be successful, bi-directional efforts are required from locals and immigrants to be open-minded and actively participate in community activities.

Reference(s):

No comments:

Post a Comment